The Indian Removal Act was signed into law by President Andrew Jackson on May 28, 1830, authorizing the president to grant lands west of the Mississippi in exchange for Indian lands within existing state borders. A few tribes went peacefully, but many resisted the relocation policy.
What was the Removal Act of 1830?
To achieve his purpose, Jackson encouraged Congress to adopt the Removal Act of 1830. The Act established a process whereby the President could grant land west of the Mississippi River to Indian tribes that agreed to give up their homelands.
What were the responsibilities given to the President under the Indian Removal Act?
It gave the president power to negotiate removal treaties with Indian tribes living east of the Mississippi. Under these treaties, the Indians were to give up their lands east of the Mississippi in exchange for lands to the west.
What was the main reason for the Indian Removal Act?
However, more immediate reasons did cause Congress to pass the Indian Removal Act of 1830 during Jackson’s presidency. The factors contributing to the fate of the Cherokees were the discovery of gold on Cherokee land, the issue of states’ rights, and the emergence of scientific racism.
What was the Indian Removal Act of 1830 quizlet?
Law passed by Congress in 1830 and supported by President Andrew Jackson allowing the U.S. government to remove the Native Americans from their eastern homelands and force them to move west of the Mississippi River. Many tribes signed treaties and agreed to voluntary removal.
How did the Indian Removal Act violate the Constitution?
Jackson warned the tribes that if they failed to move, they would lose their independence and fall under state laws. Jackson backed an Indian removal bill in Congress. Members of Congress like Davy Crockett argued that Jackson violated the Constitution by refusing to enforce treaties that guaranteed Indian land rights.
What were the consequences of the Indian Removal Act of 1830?
Intrusions of land-hungry settlers, treaties with the U.S., and the Indian Removal Act (1830) resulted in the forced removal and migration of many eastern Indian nations to lands west of the Mississippi.
What were the arguments for and against the Indian Removal Act?
They felt that building factories, expanding farming, and constructing new roads and railroads would be a better use of the land. These people also believed that the white ways of living were superior to the Native American ways of living. Other people felt it was wrong to remove the Native Americans.
What did Andrew Jackson say about the Indian Removal Act?
Jackson declared that removal would “incalculably strengthen the southwestern frontier.” Clearing Alabama and Mississippi of their Indian populations, he said, would “enable those states to advance rapidly in population, wealth, and power.”
What is the Indian Removal Act What were the causes effects of this act?
Congress complied by passing the Indian Removal Act (1830). The act entitled the president to negotiate with the eastern nations to effect their removal to tracts of land west of the Mississippi and provided some $500,000 for transportation and for compensation to native landowners.
What was the result of the Indian Removal Act quizlet?
The Indian Removal Act was signed into law in 1830. The law granted unsettled lands west of the Mississippi to Native Americans in exchange for their land with pre-existing borders. … The result of the refusal of the Seminole Indians to abandon their land in Florida. lasted 7 years.
How did the Cherokee react to the Indian Removal Act quizlet?
How did the Cherokee respond to the act? The Cherokee decided to take it to the courts and they ended up having a hearing at the Supreme Court. … He was a justice in the Supreme Court. He was apart of the Indian Removal Act case and favored the Indians.
What were the reasons for the Indian Removal Act quizlet?
Why did the Indian Removal Act happen? It was thought that the Indian nations were standing in the way of progress for the whites. You just studied 21 terms!